Tag: God (Page 7 of 10)

Why the Independent Christian doesn’t Exist

Independence  Maybe the truly handicapped people are the ones that don’t need God as much.” – Joni Eareckson Tada, The God I Love: A Lifetime of Walking with Jesus

Nothing is more precious in our culture than independence. We see it in every part of our society. We tout it because, ‘Merica. We encourage our young people to find it and tell them that when they do they’ll have what they need to find their voice. We export it, like South America exports coffee, and we do it on the backs of the fighting young to third-world countries that may never understand the sweetness of it. When we talk about attaining the “American Dream” it’s founded on the idea that you must first achieve independence; from your personal freedom and ability to “decide for yourself” to financial freedom, it’s all grounded in finding independence. Author Marcelle Hinkson said it like this, “When you are independent you learn strategies of self empowerment.” And that’s what we learn to want; to give authority and power to MYSELF so that I can achieve the things I want. 

Independence isn’t a bad thing. I’m glad we won independence as a nation. When we help another country achieve their independence, it’s a good thing. If we desire our kids to have heathy lives, marriages and families, then they need to grow up, move away from their parents basement and become independent. So, independence in and of itself is a good thing. But, in America at least, it has seeped its way into Christianity.

There are a few areas where independence doesn’t work so great; one of those is marriage (that’s a whole other blog, but quick side note, individuality is important, independence is contrary to the actual purpose of marriage.) and another is Christianity. It amazes me how many people become Christians and attempt to live out their faith independent of others. It amazes me more that no other Christian tells them that that’s wrong. Independence is not only incompatible with a Christian life, it contradicts it. Christianity is the confession that you’ve tried to do life on your own and that it’s too much. It’s literally the surrender of self empowerment to the sweetness of divine power. Christianity is dependence. 

People don’t like to think they’re dependent on anyone else. It’s scary to not be in control. People let us down and aren’t to be trusted with our most vulnerable areas of life. Theirs a belief that if you can’t control your life then you’re weak. Because Christianity is surrendering control, society views it as the religion of the weak, as a “crutch” for the weak minded. John Piper has a great sermon where he talks about that. He talks about crutches generally being a good thing, except when used to describe Christianity and who eventually realizes they need a crutch. You can read or listen to it HERE. Regardless what your feelings are about becoming a Christian, if you’re already a Christian, you’re called to live a life of dependence, not independence.

Jesus said, of Himself, “Truly, truly, I say to you, the Son can do nothing of his own accord, but only what he sees the Father doing. For whatever the Father[a] does, that the Son does likewise. For the Father loves the Son and shows him all that he himself is doing. And greater works than these will he show him, so that you may marvel.” He also said, “I and the Father are one.” If Jesus acknowledged His inability to operate outside of God the Father, where did we get the idea that we can operate outside of Him. I’ve heard lots of Christians say things like, “God and I have an understanding.” Uh, no you don’t. If your understanding is that you are weak and He is strong and apart from Him you can do nothing. Then ok, you have a pretty good understanding. If it’s that apart from Him you can do nothing, then I have the same understanding. Other than that, there is no, “I don’t go to church (or participate in Christian community) because God and I have an understanding.” or “I knows I believe in Him, so I don’t need to go to a building to prove it.” Any “understanding” that resembles anything close to those ideas, is not an understanding with God. Those are excuses; whether built out of the intent to not have to fully engage with God or the fear of full surrender, they’re still excuses.

If the excuses are fear based, I fully understand. Surrender isn’t usually viewed as a good thing and definitely not an easy thing. But surrender inside of Christianity isn’t about giving up whatever perceived “freedom” we think we have. Surrendering to Jesus is about giving up the need to try harder. We give up trying to be a “better” person. We give up the need to “fix” ourselves. Surrendering to Christ is the surrendering to rest, not the giving up of rights. Surrendering in Christianity doesn’t mean abandoning who you are; it’s entering into the fullness of who you’re meant to be. 


If you hold onto the notion that you’re an independent Christian and ideas like you don’t need community, going to church “just isn’t for you,” or you and God “have an understanding” then you’re not living the Christ following Christianity described in the Bible and that Jesus laid the foundation for. Independence and Christianity do not exist inside of the same space. There’s one body and one Spirit and we are called to interdependent unity within both. Jesus said, “…whoever abides in me and I in him, he it is that bears much fruit…” The only way to interpret that is dependency. That’s my understanding with God.

My Response to “Here’s How the New Christian Left is Twisting the Gospel”

1213-spy-vs-spy

There’s an article that recently appeared on CharismaMagazine.com on March 9, 2015 that has me both scratching my head and frustrated. The article is titled, Here’s How the New Christian Left is Twisting the Gospel. I went into reading the article with an open mind and hopeful that the title didn’t mean exactly what it sounded like; maybe it was one of those clever titles meant to draw you in. Within the first paragraph the writer, Chelsen Vicari, dashed those hopes. To provide some context, it might be better to read her article (link in title above) before you read mine.
f-vicari

I wanted to believe that Vicari was aiming her writing at those inside of Christianity that would attempt to change it into whatever is the “left” equivalent to the garbage that the Westboro Baptist have created on the “right.” I thought for a long time and had difficulty coming up with any. Maybe Rob Bell? But, that was not to be, she wasn’t just speaking to them. It seems that Vicari leveled her pen at any millennial that doesn’t attend the church their parents still do, or at least those that live out their faith in a way that doesn’t fit the right-wing, conservative, traditional evangelical church setting that their parents think it ought to. Referencing her stock photo, that also includes any young person with a face piercing, tattoo or a beanie. That means that 99.99% of Worship Leaders/Pastors of any church started in the last 10 years is twisting the Gospel. (I know, that was snarky. I’ll genuinely try to keep that to a minimum.)

In general the article was frustrating, but there were a few things about it that actually made me angry. The first is that Vicari wrongly absolves the “traditional” church from all responsibility for any gap that actually exists, with the millennials or even people in general. There’s no way that someone believes that the Church has no responsibility for the way people view us as followers of Jesus. We’ve had some major hiccups, all of them our own fault, that have hurt our credibility to be witnesses for Jesus. We, in the Church, may be Saints, but we aren’t perfect. To pretend that we don’t have responsibility for the low impression that people have of us as His followers and thus of Him, is naive at best, but more realistically idiotic. Vicari says, “They [“traditional” church] are accused of having too many rules as well as being homophobic and bigoted. Yes, we’ve heard those false claims from popular culture in its desperate attempt to keep Christianity imprisoned within the sanctuary walls.” Initially I had no idea what to even say about that, but…

I have a number of issues with this statement, here’s a few of them:

1. Evangelicalism, in the last 30 years, has done a lot to promote behavior modification as opposed to sanctification. Grant it, it may not have been intentional, but there’s traditionally been a huge focus on what a Christian should or shouldn’t do, which inadvertently created a ton of rules. That’s behavior modification, grossly legalistic and ultimately pushes those away that can’t live up to those rules.

2. As for the homophobic and bigoted title, we earned that all on our own. It’s the result of a generation of people, some that I know and are generally great people, thinking it’s ok to call people faggot or queer. It also doesn’t help when an evangelical refuses to make cake for a same gender wedding or worse when an evangelical doctor refuses to treat a same-gender couple’s baby, who by the way doesn’t have a sexual preference. Unfortunately, the many suffer for the sins of a few and the homophobe and bigot titles are ours to undo.

3. No one has done more to keep Christianity imprisoned behind the sanctuary walls than Christians. Sans a few missions trips and “community projects”, most Christians don’t generally carry their Christianity into any other part of their life. Many are content with their Sunday consumerism, careful not to intermingle their faith with their dirty office jokes, drunken benders or adulterous affairs (I’ve fallen into that category). Yes, there are many that pursue Christ daily and the world is better for it, but even still, many of those who do carry their beliefs outside the church walls are often more vocal about what we’re against rather than who we’re for. In the past there’s been far more “you’re going to HELL” evangelism than there’s been “Jesus came to die for you” evangelism. At the least, the balance is severely off. Picketing or blowing up an abortion clinic speaks far louder than a bible tract made to look like a million dollars. Again, sins of the few.

The other point that had me dumbfounded, early in the article, is that Vicari either wrongly interprets or blatantly misrepresents the difference between those millennials that are seeking a genuine marriage between proper theology and practical Jesus followership (trying to literally live our Jesus’ commands to love God, love others and make disciples) from those that are trying to creating a new avenue into Heaven and pandering to the itching ears of culture. There’s a distinct difference and Vicari somehow ignores it and lumps all millennials into one “leftist” group. It’s irresponsible and not accurate.

I really don’t want this to be a counter-attack on the “right.” It wouldn’t do us any good. I think one of the main issues inside our body is the polarization created by those in it. We already have denominations because we can’t agree on so many issues. I know that the separation between “left” and “right” has existed for some time, but it’s most recently that issues like same-gender marriage have started us down the path to greater separation. Vicar’s article does little to help bridge that gap. My hope is to not add to that chasm.

So here’s what I want to do. I want to clarify a couple points she made and then offer a few suggestions/solutions to help close the expanse between us.

Clarity

1. We aren’t meant to rest in an evangelical identity.

Vicari said, “…we can no longer rest carefree in our evangelical identity—because it is changing.” Evangelicalism is NOT an identity, at least it shouldn’t be. Call it an expression of our Christian faith or what it actually started as, a movement within the Christian faith (it sprung up out of revivalist meeting in the early to mid 1700s), but to call it an identity is folly. We are called to one identity and that’s an identity in Jesus Christ. HERE is a whole list of bible verses that speak to that. We are one in Christ, not in evangelicalism. To that end, we should never be carefree in any identity, especially in Christ. Every identity comes with a responsibility. Part of the problem with Christian consumerism is that evangelicals have let themselves become carefree in that identity (I’m guilty of that). We have to stop doing that and become active and responsible in who Christ has called us to be.

2. We’re not fighting a culture war.

Unfortunately the culture will always win. Jesus was crucified and the Apostles martyred because the culture won. The Gospel isn’t meant to change the culture, it’s meant to change the hearts of man. Only then do we have a chance to effect the culture. Rather than make war on the culture, we would do well to remember Paul’s clarification about what we are to stand against. Paul reminds us that we “…stand against the schemes of the devil. For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.” Our war is against the heavenly places, not the culture. We are to take up arms, that is God’s word and prayer, for our communities, not against them. We are to be witnesses to people’s sinful unbelief of who Jesus is, not their sinful behavior. As far as behaviors, we take up those same arms against our own sinful behaviors and inclinations.

3. Being an evangelical doesn’t make you a good follower of Jesus.

Just because you attend church and profess the same teachings that your parents do doesn’t make you a good follower of Jesus. I know people that have attended church for 30/40 years and never actually read the bible, or don’t pray consistently, or give generously, or don’t help “the least of these”, or don’t know what it actually means to follow Jesus. Many people would call them great evangelicals, but I wonder what Jesus might say to them. Our pursuit should not be focused on being a better evangelical, but rather a better follower of Jesus.

Solutions

1. Seek Unity.

We are called to be one body. We are called to be THE Church, not separate churches. Most millennials are not moving toward hearsay; they’re seeking to be better Jesus followers. There’s no reason for separation. To be fair, no one is free from responsibility for the gap that exists, so we’re all responsible for making the first move to close it.

Ephesians 4:1-6 says,

“[I] urge you to walk in a manner worthy of the calling to which you have been called, with all humility and gentleness, with patience, bearing with one another in love, eager to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. There is one body and one Spirit—just as you were called to the one hope that belongs to your call— one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all.”

2. Disciple Each Other.

One of the best things I’ve ever heard about the benefits of intergenerational ministry is that older members bring wisdom, while younger members bring passion and both benefit when they welcome the other. Maybe it’s time that millennials stop pushing away from older members because they’re too “traditional” and older members stop disregarding the younger ones because they’re too “progressive” and start cultivating relationships that encourage discipleship. After all, we’re ALL followers.

3. Be Peacemakers.

Jesus said, “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.” Now, I’m not an expert, but the opposite to that seems to be those who create disharmony won’t get to be called sons of God. That may not be true and I don’t know what the implication of that is, but that seems pretty serious to even consider. Acting like or assuming that you’re the one that has the corner market on God’s will is a dangerous place to be. Baking a cake for a same-gender wedding isn’t condoning the behavior. It’s providing a service. Does refusing to bake it cause peace or disharmony? Are they still going to get married without your cake? Could it be that baking that cake would show a genuine love for them as people, rather than your full acceptance of their lifestyle? Where do we have the opportunities to make peace? As much as that applies to in our communities, it applies tenfold inside the body of believers. It’s time to get it together. Be peacemakers.

Obviously there’s a million other things I could say, and I wanted to, but this post is already too long, so I’ll end with this. There is no “new” Christian left. Once a belief system travels outside of the foundational Gospel message (Christ is God incarnate, He was born of a virgin, He came to earth and performed miracles and wonders, was crucified for our sins, resurrected after three days, ascended into heaven and will return to usher in the new heaven and earth and to judge man for all time, and the only way to The Father is through Jesus), then it’s no longer Christian and thus not the “Christian left.” People loving their gay friend in hopes of introducing them to Jesus, isn’t a twisted Gospel, it’s THE Gospel.

As if you didn’t have enough to read, here’s some other posts that have to do with sin and our approach to living out the Gospel.

Do you think millennials have it twisted?

If you enjoyed this post, please click a button and share it.

Katy Perry Isn’t a Christian!

katy_perryAmid the glitz and glamour of the most recent Hollywood gathering, musicians and stars strut the red carpet showing off the latest fashion of the designer that paid them the most. There are speeches made and jokes told and performances… performed, all for the purpose of sucking us into a world that “everybody” dreams about being a part of. And, somewhere in all that, awards are handed out. It’s The Grammy’s!

To be honest, I didn’t watch them. I was busy enjoying my birthday dinner at The Melting Pot (go there!) and watching the mid-season premier of The Walking Dead (watch that!).

 

But, even though I didn’t watch it, without looking for it, I know two things that happened.

1. LaCrae won a grammy for Best Contemporary Christian Music Performance/Song for the song Messenger. Bravo for that!

2. Katy Perry isn’t a Christian.

Well, I don’t know if that’s true, but I do know there are plenty of Christians that made sure to make that known after her remarks to Ryan Seacrest during her Grammy interview.  I won’t call anyone out in particular, but just check the google, the Facebook or the twitter and you’ll find it. Here’s what she said:

“It’s funny, I was praying and I got a word from God and He says, ‘You got this and I got you.’ And then I was on top of the lion and a guy, a random guy, just looked on me with a headset that I’ve never communicated with before and he just looked me straight in the eyes and said, ‘You got this.’ And I was like, ‘Oh, this is God confirming I can do this.”

(Article link HERE)

Because people are entitled to their opinions, they can say whatever they want, but as Christians, we ought to be careful who we say isn’t “in”. This isn’t about calling out sin, which is important, as long as it starts with yours (HERE is a blog on that). This is about making a definitive statement about the condition of a person’s heart and what Jesus might be doing in it. We simply aren’t allowed to do that.

Most of the comments revolve around the fact that Katy said she heard from God before her Super Bowl Half Time performance and how that does’t make her a follower of Jesus. While I agree that giving God “props” for a touchdown or winning an award doesn’t make you a Jesus follower, I would caution you to be careful when making a statement that excludes the work that God may be doing in them.

As Christians, when we say things that excludes someone from our “club” it does nothing but alienate them and ignores the might and majesty of God. Just because He may not be speaking to others in the perfect way He spoke to you, doesn’t make it less perfect. It makes it grace. When we do this, we trample grace. In that case, if grace is our business, it looks like we’re headed for bankruptcy.

In Katy’s case, she grew up in the church, as a Christian, singing christian music. I assume (and this is only my assumption) that at some point during that time she spoke to God and He spoke to her. So her saying she heard from God isn’t so far-fetched. I’m not saying she’s following Christ well, or even at all, just that she’s been exposed to the truth and knows the difference. And in that, Christ can work.

My friend Tori Karr said this on the article I posted on FB:

I believe we all fall away at some point in our lives, just not to this degree. Being lazy, living for ourselves, talking about others, etc. Katy Perry’s is just magnified because she is in the spotlight and she merely sings about what MANY Christians think on a daily basis, so struggle alone in your head or tell everyone all about it, we’re very similar. I’ve met several Christian artists who were less than pleasant to be around and I could argue they were not Christ-like at all (fame and fortune gets to them just like Katy Perry). I know that she doesn’t use her stance well but when she one day realizes she needs Christ fully, think of all the people who are following her that she may help lead to Christ one day. I’m on her team. We can judge her or we can hope for the best that she will one day “return.”

She’s smart. I have a lot of smart friends.

All that to say, God’s work in others is a mystery to us and we ought to view it as that… something that we know little or nothing about, but that amazes us.

Keep talking to God, Katy!

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 BrucePagano.com

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑