Tag: church (Page 3 of 5)

Our Church Service Isn’t For You

bannerimageThis is probably going to rub some people the wrong way and some aren’t going to agree with my take on this, but I’m ok with that. My hope is that it will spark thought and conversation on why we gather as a body of believers.

I’ve long thought that the best place to bring people to experience Jesus and “get saved” was church on Sunday morning. It seemed like a great place for that to happen. There’s a ton of other believers, there’s great worship music (depending on where you attend), great biblical teaching (again, dependent on where you go), both of which evoke an emotional response and set an ideal environment to respond to the Holy Spirit. That’s how I met Jesus and how so many of my friends also met Him. There’s nothing inherently wrong with this process. Jesus did say, “For where two or three are gathered in my name, there am I among them.” So on the surface it makes sense. It’s only been in the last few years that I started to rethink that process.

It started when I was leading a college ministry. We met every Sunday evening, on campus, and had great teaching and discussion. We fully considered ourselves a church in the way that we operated, even though we were actually a ministry inside of a larger church, and because a number of people who attended our group didn’t attend any other church. One of THE most common denominators between all the hundreds of variations and denominations of Christian church is something called an alter call. This is a process whereby the Pastor, after delivering his sermon, offers the opportunity for those attending to confess Jesus as Savior and ask Him into their heart. We didn’t do it in our college ministry. Again, nothing inherently wrong with that, I answered one of those calls and here I sit. At that time we decided and felt that personal discussions made for a more informed decision. Instead of counting hands of those answering an alter call, in order to determine our “success” as a church, we opted to measure someone’s dedication and allegiance to Jesus by their willingness to serve others and in long-measured apparent transformation in their daily living. It was a more difficult metric to use and there were a lot of missteps, but we still see the fruit of that today, three years later.

As the years passed one of the things God really started to press into my heart was that He was calling me to “do” church differently, not better, than I had done it in the past. At the time I was finishing seminary and fully intended to start a traditional model institutional church and pastor as my vocation. But, God wanted something different. Without getting too deep into the model, because I plan to write a post on that soon, I felt like God was calling me to a model that sat in the middle ground between institutional church and organic house church. Some of the main elements of that were things like our homes being our front door, an all volunteer staff, and each member of the community taking responsibility for discipling others. As God developed this model in mine, and a number of my friends’, hearts, He began to change the way I saw the corporate church gathering. The model He moved us to doesn’t eliminate a large corporate gathering like an organic home church model does, but it doesn’t place all of the focus on it as a traditional institutional service would.

As I’ve read through the New Testament, over the last few years, I’ve began to realize that all of the letters the Apostles wrote were not directed at unbelievers. Everything written, after the Gospels, was written to specific Christians or to churches. The purpose was for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness so that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work. It was for those that had already confessed Christ. Christians were gathering together, devoting themselves to the apostles’ teaching and the fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers. They were attending the temple together. I started to realize that the gathering of believer’s wasn’t necessarily intended to get people “saved.” Not that it can’t or didn’t happen; I know it happens today, which helps me believe that it happened then. But I’m convinced the purpose of the corporate gathering was and is to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ.

This isn’t a call to change the way that others do church. Instead, it’s a prompt to spark thought and consideration for what it would mean to gather as a body of believers, really dig deep into God’s word, to worship, pray and praise God together so that we are equipped for the work of ministry and for every good work. What if we gathered weekly and were prepared to take Christ into the rest of our week and the rest of the world? What would happen if the depth of our corporate gathering so engulfed our life that we couldn’t have a shallow faith? What if gathering together was focused on the believer, not the unbeliever, and we were prepared to introduce people to Christ in our home or their home, then invite them into our celebration?

My church service may not be for you, but my home is.

If you enjoyed what you read, do me a favor and click one of those share buttons. Thanks.

My Response to “Here’s How the New Christian Left is Twisting the Gospel”

1213-spy-vs-spy

There’s an article that recently appeared on CharismaMagazine.com on March 9, 2015 that has me both scratching my head and frustrated. The article is titled, Here’s How the New Christian Left is Twisting the Gospel. I went into reading the article with an open mind and hopeful that the title didn’t mean exactly what it sounded like; maybe it was one of those clever titles meant to draw you in. Within the first paragraph the writer, Chelsen Vicari, dashed those hopes. To provide some context, it might be better to read her article (link in title above) before you read mine.
f-vicari

I wanted to believe that Vicari was aiming her writing at those inside of Christianity that would attempt to change it into whatever is the “left” equivalent to the garbage that the Westboro Baptist have created on the “right.” I thought for a long time and had difficulty coming up with any. Maybe Rob Bell? But, that was not to be, she wasn’t just speaking to them. It seems that Vicari leveled her pen at any millennial that doesn’t attend the church their parents still do, or at least those that live out their faith in a way that doesn’t fit the right-wing, conservative, traditional evangelical church setting that their parents think it ought to. Referencing her stock photo, that also includes any young person with a face piercing, tattoo or a beanie. That means that 99.99% of Worship Leaders/Pastors of any church started in the last 10 years is twisting the Gospel. (I know, that was snarky. I’ll genuinely try to keep that to a minimum.)

In general the article was frustrating, but there were a few things about it that actually made me angry. The first is that Vicari wrongly absolves the “traditional” church from all responsibility for any gap that actually exists, with the millennials or even people in general. There’s no way that someone believes that the Church has no responsibility for the way people view us as followers of Jesus. We’ve had some major hiccups, all of them our own fault, that have hurt our credibility to be witnesses for Jesus. We, in the Church, may be Saints, but we aren’t perfect. To pretend that we don’t have responsibility for the low impression that people have of us as His followers and thus of Him, is naive at best, but more realistically idiotic. Vicari says, “They [“traditional” church] are accused of having too many rules as well as being homophobic and bigoted. Yes, we’ve heard those false claims from popular culture in its desperate attempt to keep Christianity imprisoned within the sanctuary walls.” Initially I had no idea what to even say about that, but…

I have a number of issues with this statement, here’s a few of them:

1. Evangelicalism, in the last 30 years, has done a lot to promote behavior modification as opposed to sanctification. Grant it, it may not have been intentional, but there’s traditionally been a huge focus on what a Christian should or shouldn’t do, which inadvertently created a ton of rules. That’s behavior modification, grossly legalistic and ultimately pushes those away that can’t live up to those rules.

2. As for the homophobic and bigoted title, we earned that all on our own. It’s the result of a generation of people, some that I know and are generally great people, thinking it’s ok to call people faggot or queer. It also doesn’t help when an evangelical refuses to make cake for a same gender wedding or worse when an evangelical doctor refuses to treat a same-gender couple’s baby, who by the way doesn’t have a sexual preference. Unfortunately, the many suffer for the sins of a few and the homophobe and bigot titles are ours to undo.

3. No one has done more to keep Christianity imprisoned behind the sanctuary walls than Christians. Sans a few missions trips and “community projects”, most Christians don’t generally carry their Christianity into any other part of their life. Many are content with their Sunday consumerism, careful not to intermingle their faith with their dirty office jokes, drunken benders or adulterous affairs (I’ve fallen into that category). Yes, there are many that pursue Christ daily and the world is better for it, but even still, many of those who do carry their beliefs outside the church walls are often more vocal about what we’re against rather than who we’re for. In the past there’s been far more “you’re going to HELL” evangelism than there’s been “Jesus came to die for you” evangelism. At the least, the balance is severely off. Picketing or blowing up an abortion clinic speaks far louder than a bible tract made to look like a million dollars. Again, sins of the few.

The other point that had me dumbfounded, early in the article, is that Vicari either wrongly interprets or blatantly misrepresents the difference between those millennials that are seeking a genuine marriage between proper theology and practical Jesus followership (trying to literally live our Jesus’ commands to love God, love others and make disciples) from those that are trying to creating a new avenue into Heaven and pandering to the itching ears of culture. There’s a distinct difference and Vicari somehow ignores it and lumps all millennials into one “leftist” group. It’s irresponsible and not accurate.

I really don’t want this to be a counter-attack on the “right.” It wouldn’t do us any good. I think one of the main issues inside our body is the polarization created by those in it. We already have denominations because we can’t agree on so many issues. I know that the separation between “left” and “right” has existed for some time, but it’s most recently that issues like same-gender marriage have started us down the path to greater separation. Vicar’s article does little to help bridge that gap. My hope is to not add to that chasm.

So here’s what I want to do. I want to clarify a couple points she made and then offer a few suggestions/solutions to help close the expanse between us.

Clarity

1. We aren’t meant to rest in an evangelical identity.

Vicari said, “…we can no longer rest carefree in our evangelical identity—because it is changing.” Evangelicalism is NOT an identity, at least it shouldn’t be. Call it an expression of our Christian faith or what it actually started as, a movement within the Christian faith (it sprung up out of revivalist meeting in the early to mid 1700s), but to call it an identity is folly. We are called to one identity and that’s an identity in Jesus Christ. HERE is a whole list of bible verses that speak to that. We are one in Christ, not in evangelicalism. To that end, we should never be carefree in any identity, especially in Christ. Every identity comes with a responsibility. Part of the problem with Christian consumerism is that evangelicals have let themselves become carefree in that identity (I’m guilty of that). We have to stop doing that and become active and responsible in who Christ has called us to be.

2. We’re not fighting a culture war.

Unfortunately the culture will always win. Jesus was crucified and the Apostles martyred because the culture won. The Gospel isn’t meant to change the culture, it’s meant to change the hearts of man. Only then do we have a chance to effect the culture. Rather than make war on the culture, we would do well to remember Paul’s clarification about what we are to stand against. Paul reminds us that we “…stand against the schemes of the devil. For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.” Our war is against the heavenly places, not the culture. We are to take up arms, that is God’s word and prayer, for our communities, not against them. We are to be witnesses to people’s sinful unbelief of who Jesus is, not their sinful behavior. As far as behaviors, we take up those same arms against our own sinful behaviors and inclinations.

3. Being an evangelical doesn’t make you a good follower of Jesus.

Just because you attend church and profess the same teachings that your parents do doesn’t make you a good follower of Jesus. I know people that have attended church for 30/40 years and never actually read the bible, or don’t pray consistently, or give generously, or don’t help “the least of these”, or don’t know what it actually means to follow Jesus. Many people would call them great evangelicals, but I wonder what Jesus might say to them. Our pursuit should not be focused on being a better evangelical, but rather a better follower of Jesus.

Solutions

1. Seek Unity.

We are called to be one body. We are called to be THE Church, not separate churches. Most millennials are not moving toward hearsay; they’re seeking to be better Jesus followers. There’s no reason for separation. To be fair, no one is free from responsibility for the gap that exists, so we’re all responsible for making the first move to close it.

Ephesians 4:1-6 says,

“[I] urge you to walk in a manner worthy of the calling to which you have been called, with all humility and gentleness, with patience, bearing with one another in love, eager to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. There is one body and one Spirit—just as you were called to the one hope that belongs to your call— one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all.”

2. Disciple Each Other.

One of the best things I’ve ever heard about the benefits of intergenerational ministry is that older members bring wisdom, while younger members bring passion and both benefit when they welcome the other. Maybe it’s time that millennials stop pushing away from older members because they’re too “traditional” and older members stop disregarding the younger ones because they’re too “progressive” and start cultivating relationships that encourage discipleship. After all, we’re ALL followers.

3. Be Peacemakers.

Jesus said, “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.” Now, I’m not an expert, but the opposite to that seems to be those who create disharmony won’t get to be called sons of God. That may not be true and I don’t know what the implication of that is, but that seems pretty serious to even consider. Acting like or assuming that you’re the one that has the corner market on God’s will is a dangerous place to be. Baking a cake for a same-gender wedding isn’t condoning the behavior. It’s providing a service. Does refusing to bake it cause peace or disharmony? Are they still going to get married without your cake? Could it be that baking that cake would show a genuine love for them as people, rather than your full acceptance of their lifestyle? Where do we have the opportunities to make peace? As much as that applies to in our communities, it applies tenfold inside the body of believers. It’s time to get it together. Be peacemakers.

Obviously there’s a million other things I could say, and I wanted to, but this post is already too long, so I’ll end with this. There is no “new” Christian left. Once a belief system travels outside of the foundational Gospel message (Christ is God incarnate, He was born of a virgin, He came to earth and performed miracles and wonders, was crucified for our sins, resurrected after three days, ascended into heaven and will return to usher in the new heaven and earth and to judge man for all time, and the only way to The Father is through Jesus), then it’s no longer Christian and thus not the “Christian left.” People loving their gay friend in hopes of introducing them to Jesus, isn’t a twisted Gospel, it’s THE Gospel.

As if you didn’t have enough to read, here’s some other posts that have to do with sin and our approach to living out the Gospel.

Do you think millennials have it twisted?

If you enjoyed this post, please click a button and share it.

Rethinking the Church’s Front Door

Church DoorI love Sundays. Sundays are the day that I get together with other Christians and celebrate the good things of God. I get to submit myself to good teaching, sing songs of praise, and talk and catch up with friends. It’s good. But it wasn’t always good. It wasn’t until about five years ago that I started really appreciating Sunday church. Five years ago I met a group of believers that loved and engaged me outside of the “Sunday morning experience.” They dedicated time to my growth, which allowed me to experience genuine Gospel centered community. It wasn’t until then that I saw the benefit and joy of a Sunday morning gathering.

For the 20 years prior to that, I dreaded Sundays. When I went to church, I left feeling guilty and ashamed. I left knowing I needed Jesus, but too ashamed to approach Him, for fear of rejection or worse, chastisement. Other times, I opted not to go, but that brought its own guilt. I felt guilty for avoiding the place that made me feel guilty. So I played the game of feeling guilty when I went and feeling guilty when I didn’t. It was taxing to say the least. Eventually I committed to not going anymore, it just seemed easier than trying to get into a “club” that no one would tell me the password for. The only reason I went back is because my children were becoming old enough to understand and I wanted them to grow up with a set of decent values. But I was still only committed to just being an “attender”, nothing more.

When I first started attending church, it was because my dad’s boss invited us. Yes, it’s true that most people who are invited attend, but that doesn’t mean they stay. I didn’t and so many people I know didn’t. Everything I’ve learned church shows this drastic disparity between the early church, in which “the Lord added to their number daily those who were being saved” and today’s church, in which we have an abundance of statistics that show the mass exodus of people and pastors from the church. It doesn’t add up in my brain. Over the past few years I’ve had countless discussions about what may have happened and I think one of the issues centers around one simple thing; our front door.

As the early church evolved the “front door” to Christianity quickly became and has traditionally been the Sunday morning corporate gathering. The whole launching point for someone’s Christian faith has become the church building where people gather on Sunday mornings. From there we encourage our people to invite their family and friends back to our building. If they accept the invitation, they’re treated to an amazing musical performance, delivered an engaging sermon and asked if they want to accept Jesus. People are invited into our buildings, converted by acknowledging of our teachings, and sent back to their home with hopes that they’ll keep coming and bring others. Some do, but so many others don’t. If you look at any study done over the last two decades it appears that practice seems to be less and less effective in helping people to experience the abundant life that Jesus promised.

It’s odd to me that in a culture that seems to be seeking an authentic way to connect with others and understand where God fits, so many people walk away from or outright ignore the very entity that exists to do both of those things. Perhaps it’s time to consider that changing the way we’ve traditionally gone about inviting people to follow Jesus hasn’t been for the better. I’m not opposed to Sunday morning service. On the contrary, communal/corporate gathering and worship is essential to growing in Christ. It’s an important part of following Jesus and glorifying God. But, I think it’s better suited as a gathering intended for believers. That doesn’t mean that unbelievers won’t be there. On the contrary, they will and should, but the gathering should be for celebrating God and to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ.

So, if then the “Sunday morning” gathering is for Christians, then where does that leave our “front door” for inviting unbelievers? On our homes. The front door to following Jesus started out as the door to the Christians’ homes and it wasn’t because they didn’t have anywhere else to worship. Acts 2:46 & 47 tell us that they gathered in the Temple courts to worship together. Then they would go home and eat and praise God together. And still, “the Lord added to their number daily those who were being saved.” The 1st century Christians were hospitable people. It was a natural part of being a Christian, and was modeled by Jesus, to invite the “unclean” into a meal with you. There’s no doubt that those that were hungry, needy or rejected by the temple priests were invited into the Christians homes to eat with them. And if that be the case, it’s no doubt that they heard about Jesus, in those same homes. It would be after they heard the Good News that they would be added to the number as one of those saved. It was then that they would accompany the other believers to the Temple in order to celebrate together.

We live in an “off the hook” Christian culture, in that, as long as we invite someone to Sunday morning we’re off the hook for anything else.

~ TWEET THIS! ~

Nowadays, it doesn’t happen that way. If we even feel comfortable enough to invite our neighbor, it isn’t into our home, it’s to a building, typically located nowhere near our neighborhood. Today’s Christians don’t need a defense for the hope they have, because they just need to hand their neighbor an invite card and let the Pastor tell them about Jesus. We live in an “off the hook” Christian culture, in that, as long as we invite someone to Sunday morning we’re off the hook for anything else. I’m not downing on the corporate gathering, I love it. But maybe we should consider opening the front door to our homes and inviting people into relationship with us. When we do, we get to expose them to Jesus without show and pretense. We get to be authentic and transparent. We get to show them that we’re as messy and vulnerable as they are. It creates a more level ground than the church building does. It’s more difficult to call a Christian a hypocrite when you see behind the curtain, into their home. Then, once we’ve engaged them in an honest and transparent way and they’ve still seen Jesus in our life, the Holy Spirit can better deal with their unbelief and the seeds we plant will fall on good soil more often. It becomes about following Jesus all week, rather than just on Sunday.

The model for community in today’s Christian church looks like this:

1. Invite unbeliever to church, via an invite card.
2. Unbeliever hears pastor preach about some social issue, ties it into the Bible and hopefully Jesus.
3. Unbeliever feels guilty and some sort of wanting.
4. They attend a couple more time, finally accepting the offer to say the sinner’s prayer.
5. They’re applauded and invited to contact the church if they want more information about the decision they made.
6. They keep attending and are eventually encouraged to serve on Sunday morning and join a small home group, so that they can have community.
7. They become involved in the business of church, but rarely experience genuine community. This creates shallow roots that can be easily torn up when life become difficult.

open front doorWhat if the model looked a little different? What if instead of inviting them to church, we invited them into our life. When if we opened our front door and built relationship with our neighbors? Then when they ask about the hope we have, we’re able to give an answer. What if we put the time into cultivating rich soil, so that the seeds we plant take deep root? What if we lived life with them; grieving and celebrating with them, praying for and with them, loving on them and letting them learn to love us? What if it was after building a deep friendship, that they joyfully chose to join us to celebrate His goodness? What would it look like if our approach was intimate then corporate gathering rather than cooperate gathering with hopes of intimacy?

The front door to meeting Jesus shouldn’t be a building where people get lost in the mix, but a place where the lost become known. TWEET THIS!

What are some ways to make our homes the front door to introducing others to Jesus?

If you enjoyed this article, please share the love, by clicking one of the buttons below.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 BrucePagano.com

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑